According to Duverger’s law, the effective number
of parties in any electoral district is a function of electoral rules. (Hawkins)
Consequently, SMDP electoral rules typically produce two significant parties,
and Proportional rules produce many significant parties. In the case of the
country of Sweden, this law holds true.
Sweden follows proportional electoral rules,
specifically, a modified Sainte-Langue method. This method distributes seats
according to the formula quot= V/(2s + 1),
where V is the total number of votes a party receives, and s is the number of
seats allocated to the part, which is initially zero. The party with the highest
quotient receives a seat, and their quotient is then recalculated. (Wikipedia,
Sainte Langue) Sweden modifies this method in the following way. All seats are
not allocated in this manner. If it is determined that a party has not been
properly awarded their share of seats, and they have more than four percent of
national votes, or more than twelve percent of votes in their constituency,
they are entitled to one of thirty nine adjustment seats. Votes are cast in a
closed list, preferential format, with parliamentary elections held once every
four years. If a seat is vacant, such as if a member died, are filled by
substitute members chosen each previous election. In this system, votes are cast for party
lists, and if the voter so chooses, they can express preferences for individual
candidates. In such cases. “the required threshold for election on the basis of
personal votes is 8 percent of the total cast for the candidates party in the
constituency concerned.” (IPU, Sweden Election Rules) Parties that received
less than one percent of the national vote in the previous election are unable
to have party ballots, and therefore, are not counted. (IFES Election Guide,
Sweden)
As of September 19, 2010, when the last
parliamentary general election occurred, nine parties out of twenty-one parties
received seats, and therefore, had more than four percent of the national vote.
District magnitude varies from two to thirty nine per district, with an average
of approximately nine per district. (Wikipedia, General Elections in Sweden,
2010 ) According to the formula given in class, Neff=1/Σ(p^2), with Neff being the number of effective parties, and p
being the percentage of seats each party received. Approximately, the formula,
in Sweden’s case, ends up being Neff=1/.30724, which equals, 3.255. Sweden has
about three effective political parties, which agrees with Duverger’s law. There
are two major parties, the Social Democrats, and the Moderate Party, and a
handful of little ones, who approximately equal the two major parties in
numbers. Of course, alliances are formed in the Swedish Parliament in order to
achieve the majority needed to pass legislation, which forces the Social
Democrats, and the Moderates to make compromises, strengthening the position of
the smaller parties. This is, precisely, the goal of the Swedish electoral
system, protecting the rights of the minority parties, and weakening the power
of the larger parties. Sweden has a strongly proportional electoral system, and
as such, has more than two effective parties.
In conclusion, Sweden effectively proves
Duverger’s law. Sweden, with a highly proportional electoral system, a modified
Sainte-Langue, in turn, as would be expected, has multiple effective parties.
Sweden particularly protects the rights of smaller parties, allocating extra
seats if a party has more than 4% of the national vote, or 12% in a
constituency. Sweden has approximately 3.5 parties.
Works Cited.
Hawkins, Kirk. Syllabus. Blog 7: Duverger’s Law.
"Sainte-Langue." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 26 Oct. 2012. Web. 01 Nov. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sainte-Lagu%C3%AB_method>
“Swedish General
Elections, 2010” Wikepedia. Wikimedia
Foundation, 25 Nov. 2010 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_general_election,_2010>
"Sweden Electoral Rules." IPU PARLINE. Parline Database, n.d. Web. <http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2303_B.htm>
“Election Guide for Sweden” Election Guide.
IFES. Web. Nov 1. <http://electionguide.org/country.php?ID=206?
Great job! I appreciate how well written it is and easy to understand
ReplyDeleteNice work, especially with making the formulas understandable even to non-political science people.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the statements above. You did a very good job in explaining the diffrent formulas and the fact that you really supported your thesis.
ReplyDelete