Thursday, November 8, 2012

Qui Vive?- Blog 8


“Vive La Revolution!” is the cry that accompanied the French Revolution as the ideas brought from the Enlightenment began to plant themselves deeply into the French mind caused them to rise up in arms against the King. Now the events of 1789-1799 may have been quite spectacular but what would define it as an actual revolution. We are going to take a closer look at what identifies it as a revolution and how it compares to the definition of a revolution.
             The events of the French Revolution was a culmination of pressures from living under an absolute monarchy, rising bread prices, inability of the Esates-General to make any headway in the financial crisis, and the ideas of philosophers such as Voltaire and Montesquieu becoming the center of parlor talk (it was a real pain according to Christopher Hibbert in his book called The Days of the French Revolution ). These frictions culminated into the hostilities that ensued as the Third Estate (common people) rose up, took the Tennis Court oath (on oath to never give up till a constitution was assured, according to Marshall Thompson), and stormed the Bastille, considered the symbol of everything the people hated(Schama,Citizens).  Don’t think for a moment that the men were the only ones who had part, the woman took the streets and forced the King to move to Paris from Versailles (Doyle, Oxford History of the French Revolution). Out of the turmoil, eventually arose the Republic of France and a constitution which stayed the same until Napoleon Bonaparte staged his coup and installed the Consulate(David Nichols, Napoleon).
            Now that we have a good gist of what happened in the French Revolution, and see what defines it as a revolution. David J. Samuels in his book Comparative Politics defines a revolution as “an armed conflict within a sovereign state between insurgents and the state, in which both the insurgents and the state claim allegiance of a significant proportion of the population; authority over the state is forcibly transferred from the state to the insurgents, and the insurgents subsequently bring about wholesale political change.” Now the insurgents were the Third Estate and, of course, the home team with the King and all His men who couldn’t put the country back together. So we have two groups of people with plenty of support both fighting for dominance. Throughout this time we see the people at large looking for great social change, which resulted in more power to the people and the king being diminished from his absolute monarchy. Eventually resulting in a republic, which is a great shift from where it was before. Samuels also mentions that the insurgents win in a revolution, which is true in this instance since obviously the king didn’t stay in power. King Louis XVI was in fact beheaded before all was said and done. The French Revolution was more than a civil war because the insurgents became increasingly popular, whereas civil wars have groups who aren’t as popular as the Vox populi that rose to power.
            In conclusion, when the question, qui vive (Long Live Who?), was asked,  the response was Vive La Revolution! The French Revolution was a fundamental change that brought about the France we have today. They still remember the storming of Bastille and the success it had brought, and they remember it with Bastille Day on the 14th of July every year.  The people rose up to claim their rights as equals and a civilized nation. In the words of Les Miserables by Victor Hugo, “If you wish to understand what Revolution is, call it Progress; and if you wish to understand what Progress is, call it Tomorrow.”
           


WORKS CITED:
Hibbert, Christopher, “The Days of The French Revolution”. New York Quill
Thompson, Marshall Putnam (1914). "The Fifth Musketeer: The Marquis de la Fayette". Proceedings of the Bunker Hill Monument Association at the annual meeting. p. 50
Schama, Simon (2004) [1989]. “Citizens”. Penguin.
Doyle, William (1990). “The Oxford history of the French Revolution (3rd ed.)”. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
David Nicholls, Napoleon: a biographical companion (1999) p.
David J Samuels. “Comparative Politics”, Pearson

3 comments:

  1. The French Revolution is really interesting to learn about in my opinion. You say it becomes a republic which simply means a government without a monarch. I don't know a lot about French history but I know that what followed was aptly called the reign of terror. It would be interesting to analyze this specifically and see how it ranks on the political violence scale.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great connection in intro and conclusion, I love Les Mes, and good topic. I felt you could analyze the definition of a revolution more and focus less on the French history.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sounds pretty complicated to me. Yet again, the French are kind of complicated. But great job. Interesting to see how political violence affected France.

    ReplyDelete