Emily Coesens
Prof. Hawkins
Pl Sc 150
November 2, 2012
Blog
7 Duverger’s Law: Australia
Australia
is a democracy that has a direct preferential majority vote voting system. Within this system voters will rank the
candidates in order of preference on the ballot. When determining the seats each delegate gets
within the House of Representatives the individual who receives an absolute
majority, 50 percent plus 1 of the votes, will receive the seat; however, if an
absolute majority is not reached, those who voted for the candidate with the
lowest amount of votes will have their votes transferred to their second
preference. This will continue until one
of the candidates receives an absolute majority. Another interesting fact about Australia’s
voting system is that voting is compulsory, and those eligible who do not vote
must pay a fine. The district magnitude is based upon population and therefore
the number of seats allotted to each electoral district is dependent on that,
making it a multi-member district. The formula used to allocate the seats is as
stated earlier a preferential majority vote or in other words a plurality
style. The list structure is done through listing individuals vying for the
seats rather than the party in which they are running for. Those voting are supposed to rate each
candidate in order of preference for the voting system to work. The order in which they are listed is done by
a random draw and there seems to be no information as to whether there is a
threshold for a party to be registered as a party; however to be elected in the
House of Representatives one must receive a minimum of 50 percent plus 1 of the
votes.
The
party system in Australia is an interesting one. For intents and purposes they are said to be
a two-party system; however if one looks deeper it can be seen that one of
these parties is not a solid unit but rather a coalition. The determination for the effective number of
parties for this country is not black and white; for there are two ways it can
be done. On one hand you could consider
the coalition to be one party as many view it or you could separate it into its
different sections which is how others view it.
If you were to take the first, when completing the formula the effective
number of parties comes out to be 2.19, but when you separate the party into
coalitions the resulting formula ends up equaling 2.95. So I suppose Australia could be considered to
have three effective parties if you were to separate the coalition, but only
two parties if you do not.
With
this information Duverger’s law may be correct.
He “states that the effective number of parties in any electoral
district is a function of the electoral rules: SMDP rules produce two effective
parties, while proportional representation rules allow for more, depending on
whether or not there are multiple social cleavages.” Australia has a proportional
representation system; according to the data it is determined to only have two
effective parties as long as the coalition is counted as one party. On the
other hand if one allows the coalition to be determined as a grouping of
several different parties then the law would be incorrect for then the data
shows that there are three effective parties.
For all intents and purposes the law is upheld by the statistics found
in Australia, for even though there are different areas in the coalition they
act more like subsections of a single party than a different party, and if they
are claiming to be part of the same party then they can be counted as so.
Works
Cited
Australian
Electoral Commission. Voting-House of Representatives. 1 November 2012 <http://www.aec.gov.au/voting/How_to_vote/Voting_HOR.htm>.
Australian
Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. About Australia. 1 November
2012 <http://www.dfat.gov.au/facts/electoral_system.html>.
The
Inter-parliamentary Union. Australia House of Representatives. 1 November 2012
<http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2015_E.htm>.
Wikipedia.
House of Representatives (Australia). 1 November 2012 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Representatives_%28Australia%29>.
Wow, that's a pretty complex system, especially interesting to me was the compulsory vote. Good work!
ReplyDeletenice info..The principal of Heckenberg Lawyers, Graeme Heckenberg has more than 20 years expertise working as a specialist lawyer in contested wills and deceased estate litigation and has a respected reputation and is recognised as an expert in this specialised area of law.Estate Litigation Lawyers Sydney
ReplyDelete