Within states, actors often cannot
achieve their goals through peaceful processes; sometimes, they resort to
violence. Political violence is defined as “the use of force by states or
non-state actors to achieve political goals.” (Samuels, 258) There are four
main categorizations of political violence: civil wars, revolutions, genocide,
and terrorism (Samuels, 259). These types are not easily defined; there are
many definitions for each categorization. These broad definitions aren’t always
perfect, and have their strengths and weaknesses.
In December 1980, Uganda held
elections, and Milton Obote’s Uganda People’s Congress (UPC) party came into
power, and Obote was elected president (Uganda). After these elections, there
was much unrest within Uganda, largely spreading from Yoweri Museveni, one of
Obote’s challengers in the election, and his Uganda Patriotic Movement (UPM)
party. Museveni accused Obote and the UPC of electoral fraud; he then retreated
far away from the capitol with his supporters and declared an armed rebellion against
Obote and his government (Ottunnu). This was the beginning of the Ugandan Bush
War. Museveni joined forces with Yusuf Lule, a former Ugandan president, and
created the National Resistance Army (NRA). The violence began in February of
1981, when the NRA attacked a Ugandan military installation. For five years,
the violence between Museveni’s National Resistance Army and Obote’s Uganda
National Liberation Army (UNLA) continued (Ottunnu). In 1987, the NRA
prevailed, and Museveni assumed the position of president, which he still holds
today (UGANDA: Profile). By the end of the war, there were around 500,000
casualties and losses (Bercovitch).
This instance of political violence,
the Ugandan Bush War, fits in one of the four categorizations – it was a civil
war. It clearly isn’t terrorism, “threatened or actual use of violence for
political purposes…directed particularly against civilian targets,” or genocide,
“a coordinated plan seeking to eliminate all members of particular…national
groups, through mass murder.” (Samuels, 276) However, there could be some
dispute over whether this war was a revolution or a civil war. A civil war is
defined as “armed combat within the boundaries of a sovereign state between
parties that are subject to common authority at the start of the hostilities.”
(Samuels, 259) A revolution is a type of civil war in which the insurgents
fight against the state and win, bringing about wholesale political change
(Samuels, 269). While Yoweri Museveni and his National Resistance Army defeated
Obote’s government, he did not bring about wholesale political change – in
essence, he merely changed the outcome of an election. His rule didn’t
revolutionize or drastically change the nation. Thus, the Ugandan Bush War can
be categorized as a civil war.
David J Samuels’ definition of civil
war, as previously stated, is “armed combat within the boundaries of a
sovereign state between parties that are subject to common authority at the
start of the hostilities.” (Samuels, 259) When used to categorize the Ugandan
Bush War, it is a good definition. When the war began, Museveni, his supporters,
the National Resistance Army, and Obote, his supporters, and the Uganda
National Liberation Army were all under the same state government, led by Obote
(Uganda). All the violence incurred during the Bush War occurred within Uganda’s
borders, and there was definitely armed combat between the NRA and the UNLA –
supported by the hundreds of thousands of casualties. The one area Samuels’
definition is lacking is specificity on the outcome of the civil war – about how
the insurgents can win, and it can still be a civil war as long as wholesale political
change is lacking. A final definition could be “armed combat within the
boundaries of a sovereign state between parties that are subject to common
authority at the start of the hostilities, with an outcome in which the
prevailing party does not bring about wholesale political change.”
Citations
Samuels,
David J. Comparative Politics : Pearson. 2012. Print.
"Uganda:
The Second Obote Regime (1981-85)." Library of Congress Country
Studies. Library of Congress, 1990. Web. 08 Nov. 2012.
Ottunnu,
Ogenga. "Causes and Consequences of the War in Acholiland." Conciliation
Resources. N.p., 2002. Web. 8 Nov. 2012.
"UGANDA:
Profile of Yoweri Kaguta Museveni." IRIN News. UN Office for
the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairsr, 15 Feb. 2006. Web. 08 Nov. 2012.
Bercovitch,
Jacob, and Richard Jackson. International Conflict: A Chronological
Encyclopedia of Conflicts and Their Management 1945-1955. N.p.: B&J,
1997. Print.
I agree that the difference in the outcome makes this a civil war.
ReplyDeleteThis is a very intriguing conflict, and I particularly like your analysis of the idea that a civil war can result in victory over the state without being a revolution. It seems that doesn't happen very often, but still makes sense.
ReplyDeleteUganda is a really interesting country with a crazy past... this Bush War sounds really intense, and I like your point that it is better categorized as a civil war. Well done.
ReplyDeleteInteresting, I hadn't heard much about the Ugandan Bush War before, I'll have to study it.
ReplyDelete