Duverger’s Law
The
purpose of this blog is to explore the relationship between the electoral
system and the number of relevant political parties in a state. More specifically I will discuss
whether Duverger’s law (and Cox’s modification of this law), which
states that “the effective number of parties in any electoral district is a
function of the electoral rules: SMDP rules produce two effective parties,
while proportional representation rules allow for more,” is true.[i] For
this post I have chosen to research the electoral system of Peru.
To
start, some background information about Peru’s government will be necessary. Peru utilizes a proportional
representation system, meaning that the strength of political parties in
congress is proportional (more or less) to their strength in the electorate.[ii] Since this is the case, I will be
looking to see if there is a large amount of effective number of parties in the
country, not just two.
Delving
deeper, the specific type of PR (proportional representation) system of Peru
uses a closed (nonpreferential) party list structure.[iii] Thus, parties create and submit a list
of candidates from their party, and voters vote for political parties, not for
specific candidates.
The
country is divided up into 25 administrative regions, and directly elects the
130 seats of their legislative body, Congreso de la República.[iv]
Based on what I could find, it appears that the district magnitude of each
region is around 5.2. I took the
total number of seats in the congress and divided it by the number of constituencies
assuming that each district elected roughly the same number of seats.
Based
on the prior background information on the electoral rules of Peru, it is clear
that it uses a PR system. Now to
see if this coincides with Duverger’s law that states as a result of the PR
system used there should be more than two effective parties competing for
power.
In
the latest elections in 2011, there were no less than 13 parties or coalition
of parties facing off to win seats in the congress.[v] Several of Peru’s parties who won seats
were actually coalitions of parties.
For example the party Gana Peru who won 25.3% of the votes and 47 of the
130 seats is made up Partido Nacionalista Peruano, Partido Socialista, and
others.
I
used the formula discussed in our last lecture to find the number of effective
parties:
Political
Party
|
Percentage
Votes
|
Seats
Won
|
Percentage
Seats
|
Porportion
Squared
|
Gana
Peru
|
25.30%
|
47
|
0.361538462
|
0.130710059
|
Fuerza
|
23%
|
37
|
0.284615385
|
0.081005917
|
PP
|
14.80%
|
21
|
0.161538462
|
0.026094675
|
Alliance
for great change
|
14.40%
|
12
|
0.092307692
|
0.00852071
|
National
solidarity
|
10.20%
|
9
|
0.069230769
|
0.004792899
|
Peruvian
aprista party
|
6.40%
|
4
|
0.030769231
|
0.000946746
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sum
|
|
|
|
0.252071006
|
1/sum
(# of effective parties)
|
|
|
|
3.96713615
|
Based
on this formula, there are 4 effective parties operating in Peru’s
congress.
Another
final factor to consider that could contribute to the number of effective
parties in Peru is its threshold, or the rules for how many votes you need to
retain you status as a legitimate party.
Not a lot of information could be found on this subject. However one article on political party
aid written in 2004 did say that “The main Peruvian political parties…
successfully pushed for the enactment of a new political party law….It raises
the petition signature threshold for the registration of parties and requires
parties to have offices in many parts of the country.”[vi]
To
conclude, no two parties dominate the political stage, and there are several
operating political parties in the country, and based on the formula there are
four effective parties in Congreso de la Rebública. Therefore, In considering the political parties and the
electoral system of Peru, Duverger’s law holds true.
[i] Assignment Details: Duverger’s Law. Learning Suite. <https://learningsuite.byu.edu/student,home.0>
[ii] Shively, W.
P. "Chapter 10: Elections." Power & Choice An Introduction to Political Science. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012. 231. Print.
[iii] "IPU PARLINE Database: PERU (Congreso De La República),
Electoral System." IPU PARLINE Database: PERU (Congreso De La República),
Electoral System. Inter-Parliamentary Union,
2012. Web. 02 Nov. 2012.
<http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2251_B.htm>
[iv] "Central Intelligence Agency." CIA. CIA, Nov. 2012. Web. 02 Nov. 2012. <https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/pe.html>
[v] "Elections in Peru." Wikipedia. Wikimedia
Foundation, 25 Oct. 2012. Web. 02 Nov. 2012.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Peru>.
[vi] Carothers, Thomas. Political Party Aid. Rep.
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, n.d. Web. 1 Nov. 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment