Professor David J. Samuels defines political violence as
“the use of force by states or non-state actors to achieve political goals”
(Samuels 2012). He also outlines several different forms of political violence
including civil war, revolution, suicide terrorism and genocide. How reliable
are these categories and their definitions? The only way to test this would be
to find a real-life example and compare our given definition.
On
April 24, 1915, Ottoman authorities arrested 250 Armenian intellectuals and
community leaders in Constantinople. Thereafter, the Ottoman military uprooted
Armenians from their homes and forced them to walk hundreds of miles, depriving
them of food and water, to the desert of what is now Syria. Massacres were
indiscriminate of age or gender, with commonplace rape and sexual abuse (“Armenian
Genocide” 2012).
In the
Ottoman Empire, the Armenian people were never considered as fully equal.
During the 19th and early 20th centuries, toleration
degenerated into frequent persecutions, often escalating into massacres. The
genocide of the Armenians in 1915 was the first of the modern
ideologically-motivated genocides (Chalk et al. 1990). It was the Ottoman
government’s systematic extermination of its minority Armenian subjects from
their historic homeland in the territory constituting the present day republic
of Turkey. It took place during and after World War I and was implemented in
two phases: the wholesale killing of the able-bodied male population through
massacre and forced labor, and the deportation of women, children and the
elderly and infirm on death marches to the Syrian Desert. The total number of
people killed as a result has been estimated at between 1 and 1.5 million
(“Armenian Genocide” 2012)
So
according to Samuels, genocide is “a coordinated plan seeking to eliminate all
members of particular ethnic, religious, or national groups, through mass
murder” (Samuels 2012). Does this definition accurately categorize this
Armenian tragedy as genocide? Many people, including the republic of Turkey
deny the word “genocide” as an accurate description of these events despite
repeated calls to accept these events (“Armenian Genocide” 2012). The Armenian
genocide does fit the definition in that it was a “coordinated plan” because it
was most certainly arranged by the Ottoman government; that it was a
“particular ethnic, religious or national group” in this case, the Armenian
people would have been so characterized by ethnic, religious and national ties;
and that it was “through mass murder” which in this case included mass
burnings, drowning, uses of poison and drugs, deportations and extermination
camps (“Armenian Genocide” 2012).I think that one of the weak points of Samuels’
definition is the phrase “eliminate all”. One point of historical significance
in the case of the Armenian Genocide was that the Ottomans were not trying to
eliminate all of the Armenian people;
they were trying to drive them out of what is now Turkey. When the word
“eliminate” is used, there is a connotation of eliminating anyone in that
particular group. This is why I think that “eliminate” may be the wrong word. I
think a better word would be “remove”.
I
submit that the textbook’s definition of genocide is a suitable definition. It
accurately describes the events and tells why the Armenian genocide would be classified
as genocide. It is a strong definition, but it could be a better definition. I
don’t by any means wish to throw away the definition and present a new idea. I
think the given definition needs a slight change in order to comply with the
Armenian Genocide. If the phrase “eliminate all” were altered in the
definition, it would be more accurate. The rest of the definition stands as
applicable. According to this case study, genocide may be defined as “a
coordinated plan seeking to remove members of particular ethnic, religious, or
national groups through mass murder”.
Chalk, Frank, and Kurt Jonassohn. The History and Sociology
of Genocide. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.
Samuels, David J. Comparative Politics. Pearson Education,
Inc., 2012.
Wikipedia, "Armenian Genocide." Last modified
2012. Accessed November 8, 2012.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide.
Nice paper. And good catch with the definition modification. I've noticed that a lot of his definitions are close, but not precise enough.
ReplyDeleteWell written and highlights well how definitions are inherently tricky in trying to apply them to specific circumstances.
ReplyDeletegood job fine tuning the definitions, making them more precise with less overlap and applying your own analysis
ReplyDeleteGood job! Why didn't I pick something interesting like this? Although you did forget a period at the end of the 3rd paragraph... grammar nazi :)
ReplyDelete