Blog
7: Duverger’s Law
According
to Maurice Duverger and Gary Cox, the effective number of political parties in
a country depends entirely on the electoral rules. They both support the claim that when
electoral rules dictate that when there is one member of the legislature for
every district and he or she wins with plurality vote (receiving the most
votes, regardless of whether or not it is actually fifty percent) instead of
majority vote (over fifty percent) then there will end up being only two
effective parties. However, if the
districts each elect multiple members of the legislature and they are chosen
through a proportional representation system (a party will receive roughly the
same percentage of seats as they do percentage of votes) then there will be
more than two effective parties (Shively 231).
To
test Deverger’s Law, I chose to continue my study of Colombia. Colombia has a bicameral legislature with a
Chamber of Representatives and a Senate.
For this study I focused on the Chambor of Representatives which has 164
members elected with a proportional representation system (Wikipedia) and
calculated the number of existing effective parties. To find this number I took the percentages of
seats each party won, squared them, found the sum of those numbers, and found
one divided by that answer to find that Colombia has 5 effective political
parties, which does support Duverger’s Law.
To
find out more, I looked into Colombia’s electoral rules, starting with the
district magnitude to find out how many seats were allotted to each electoral
district. The Chamber has 164 seats in
total and 33 districts. I divided the
number of seats by the number of districts to find that roughly 5 members of
the Chamber were allotted to each district.
However, I also found out that only 2 members are actually assigned to
each the district. The rest depends on
population. The district will receive 1
more representative for every 250,000 more people it has after the first
250,000, so the system favors more heavily populated areas.
However,
because the percentage of votes cannot match up exactly with the percentage of
seats, there must be a formula for calculating who the extra seats go to. The formula Colombia uses is the largest
remainder (IPU Parline Database). With
this method, the percentages are rounded down at first and seats are
distributed. Then the rest of the seats
are distributed based on which party has the greatest remainder. For example,
if one party receives 25.9% of the vote and another receives 22.3%, the first
party would be given 25% of the seats and the other would be given 22%. Then, if there was one seat left, it would be
given to the first party which had a remainder of .9% while the other had a
remainder of only .3%. This method is
very efficient at making the distribution as close as it possibly can be.
Proportional
Representation makes it difficult to have the people vote for individual
candidates, most countries that use this system have the people vote for a
party. Each party then has a list of
candidates and when it receives the number of seats it is allowed to fill, it
simply begins at the top of the list until it has enough candidates to fill the
spots it receives. However, in some
countries have a preferential list structure where the people are still allowed
to vote for a specific candidate within the party list. Colombia has a non-preferential list, where
the party does not allow the people to vote for specific people within the
party list. Should a vacancy arise in
the Chamber between elections, the party simply picks the next person on the
list (IPU Parline Database).
Because
the proportional representation system allows for very small parties to gain a
spot, some governments, in order to make the election process more simply, have
a threshold where unless a party can receive a certain percentage of the votes,
it cannot win any seats in the legislature.
Colombia does not have a threshold.
In 2010, one of the parties only received .1% of the vote and it was
still granted one of the seats. The only
way a party cannot get a seat is if it cannot get a percentage of the vote that
is high enough to get it a seat (Wikipedia).
According
to the information calculated and found, Colombia proves Duverger’s Law to be
correct. Single Member District
Plurality Systems result in a system with only two effective parties while
Proportional Representation Systems result in multiple parties having an effect
in the legislature.
Works Cited
Colombia: House of
Representatives. Inter-Parliamentary Union.
http://ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2067_B.htm. Web. 31 October, 2012.
Elections in Colombia.
Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Colombia.
Web. 31 October 2012.
Shively, W. Phillips. Power
and Choice: An Introduction to Political Science. New York: McGraw-Hill
Companies Inc. 2012
Your post is really well written! You make it interesting to read but still have an informative tone. It is very interesting to me that Columbia doesn't have a threshold and that the party you mentioned who only received .1% of the vote still won a seat.
ReplyDelete