Michael Sean Covey
Blog 7
Duverger’s Law
Maurice
Duverger hypothesized that proportional representation rules produce
multi-party systems, whereas single member district plurality (SMDP) rules produce
two effective parties (1). Or in other words, the number of political parties in
a given district is a function of the electoral rules. This hypothesis has now
been called Duverger’s Law, and the current State of Israel is a great example
that shows this law holding true.
The State
of Israel proves Duverger’s Law because it is evident that their multi-party system
stems from their proportional representation (PR) rules. They have a parliamentary democracy with a unicameral
legislature, called the Knesset, which is made up of 120 members elected on
four-year terms (3). These members are elected by nationwide proportional
representation, meaning that the entire state of Israel is one voting district
and one constituency—there are not separate district constituencies like in the
United States Senate, where each state receives two senators (5). Therefore,
parliamentary seats in Israel are given to parties in proportion to how many
votes each party wins. Israel also has a closed, non-preferential list
structure, which means that citizens vote for parties, not for specific candidates.
For example, in the 2009 elections, the Likud Party won 22% of the national
vote and so they received 22% of the seats in the Knesset (2). Israel is a straight PR system and not a
hybrid system, and like in most other PR systems, parties in Israel usually
have to form coalitions in order to win a majority of seats (61 out of 120) and
form the government. In 2009, Benjamin
Netanyahu and the Likud Party formed a coalition with the Yisrael Beiteinu,
Labor, and Shas parties to combine for 66 seats, which then allowed them to set
up the current government. Israel’s PR rules naturally produce a strong
multi-party system (2).
Israel also
has a low voting threshold of 2%, which means that a party only needs at least
2% of the national vote to receive a seat in government (5). This low threshold
allows small parties and minority groups to be heard, such as the Arab parties.
In 2009, the United Arab List-Ta’al party met the threshold with 3% of the
vote, so they won 3% of the seats. On
the other hand, The Green Movement-Meimad party did not win any seats in
parliament because they did not meet the required threshold—they only got about
1% of the vote (2). Smaller parties are also allowed to form coalitions in
order to meet the 2% threshold, similar to the way in which larger parties form
coalitions to win a majority in the government. These rules encourage many
parties to run for office and show that Duverger’s Law holds true.
Using the
formula we learned in class (1 divided by the sum of the squares of the
proportion of seats won for each party), Israel’s number of effective parties
is 6.77. This shows that there are many influential political parties in
Israel, not just two like in the United States. In the most recent 2009 Knesset
elections, for example, there were 33 registered parties on the ballot, 12 of which
met the threshold and received at least a few seats in parliament (4)(2).
In
conclusion, the State of Israel is a solid example of Duverger’s Law holding
true. Israel’s proportional
representation rules naturally produce a strong multi-party system. Their
single constituency, low threshold, and ability to form coalitions encourage
many parties to run and allow many voices to be heard.
Works Cited:
(1) “Duverger’s
Laws: Between social and institutional determinism.” Da Silva, Virgilio Afonso.
European Journal of Political Research.
1 Nov. 2012. Web. http://web.ebscohost.com.erl.lib.byu.edu/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=4&hid=119&sid=7de277d6-bc28-4e0c-b9b5-75c0dd5378f0%40sessionmgr112
(2) Knesset
Board of Elections. Israeli Government. 1 Nov. 2012. Web. http://www.knesset.gov.il/elections18/heb/results/main_Results.aspx
(3) “Israel.”
CIA World Factbook. 1 Nov. 2012. Web. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/is.html
(4) “34
Parties Make Knesset Bid.” Miskin, Maayana. Arutz
Sheva News. 1 Nov. 2012. Web. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/129127#.UJNkCu2JtUQ
(5) “The
Electoral System in Israel.” The Knesset. 1 Nov. 2012. Web. http://www.knesset.gov.il/description/eng/eng_mimshal_beh.htm
Well written blog. I think that you did a great job explaining the thresholds that were in place and how they can effect the voting.
ReplyDeleteVery well-written. Israel would be an interesting country to evaluate and you explained your reasoning well, it was easy to understand.
ReplyDeleteI really like the way your organized your blog. All of the sources you used brought in effective numbers and stats that really backed up your argument. I thought your thesis was very clear and that you pieced together the evidence really well. Good work!
ReplyDeleteGood job. I like your threshold explanation
ReplyDeleteVery well written, I agree with everyone else. I was not aware Israel had that many effective parties!
ReplyDelete