Blog
7: Duverger’s Law
Romania
uses proportional representation system in order to determine
the number of seats that are allocated to each party. Duverger’s law states
that proportional representation, Romania uses a variation of this form, makes
it easier for more than two political parties to be represented in government.
It also states that the parties are not only represented but also influential
and effective. When observing the percentages of seats allocated to parties in
Romania through a form of proportional representation, four different parties
received a decent amount of seats. This proves that Duverger’s law is correct
in its assumption that proportional representation provides better
representation for smaller, less significant parties.
The
electoral system of Romania directly elects its representatives and distributes
the number of seats in direct relation to the number of votes each party
receives. The district magnitude for Romania is one, because there are 137
single-member constituencies. (IPU) The threshold to win parliamentary
representation is 160,000 votes. (IPU) Romania uses the D’Hondt formula in
order to decide how to allocate seats to the different parties. (Electionworld)
This formula allocates seats using proportional representation based upon the
number of votes each party received. Members of Parliament are elected through
closed party list proportional representation. This means that the people of
Romania cannot vote specifically for a candidate that they prefer, but rather
for the party’s list as a whole. Parties endorse the candidates that they like,
and it is the people’s choice to vote for their preferred party. Although the
citizens of Romania are not able to vote for a specific candidate, if their
party receives enough votes, they will gain representation in Parliament even
if their party is not one of the two dominant parties.
Duverger’s Law
claims that proportional representation leads to an increase in the number of
parties present in government. While there are two leading political parties in
Romania, there are multiple smaller parties who carry a significant number of
votes and thus are given an influential number of seats in Parliament. In the
European Parliament election in 2009 in Romania, there were a total of
thirty-three seats available. Those seats were divided up between the top five
parties with the largest number of votes. The Social Democratic Party +
Conservative Party Alliance received 31% of the votes and was allocated 11 out
of the 33 available seats. The Democratic Liberal Party received 29% of the
votes of the people and was given 10 seats in Parliament. The National Liberal
Party received 14% of the vote and 5 seats. The Democratic Union of Hungarians
in Romania only received 9% of the votes but they were allocated 3 seats
according to proportional representation. And lastly, the Greater Romanian
Party achieved 8% and was also given 3 seats in Parliament. (Electionworld)
Therefore, Duverger’s law is correct in stating that proportional
representation allows for smaller political parties have a good chance of being
represented in the Romanian Parliament.
In the case of the
electoral system of Romania, Duverger’s law is proven to be correct. The
Romanian people voted for two main parties, but the smaller parties that
received a significant percentage of the votes were not eliminated.
Proportional representation gave twelve out of the thirty-three seats available
in Parliament to the small parties. This accurately represents the opinions of
the citizens of Romania, because the majority of them agree with the views of
the two larger parties but those who support the lesser-known parties still
receive representation in the legislature.
Bibliography
Hawkins, Kirk. “Electoral Systems.”
Lecture. October 31, 2012
Wikipedia. “Elections in Romania.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Romania
Inter-Parliamentary Union. “Romania.”
http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/reports/2262_B.htm
I think the blog is well written and provides yet another example of Duverger's Law holding true. I agree with the premise of the Law and my country came up with the same results.
ReplyDelete