Blog 5
Identifying with the LDS church has a significant impact on your
political decisions. This religion changes a person’s perspective on life and
therefore how you view politics. There is a distinct LDS political identity in
the United States because of a common American heritage and a core set of
shared beliefs.
In class we
defined political identity as “any identity that significantly shapes our
political decisions” (Hawkins). Being LDS does not mean you have to be either a
Democrat or a Republican and many Mormons come from both parties. This would
make it appear that there is little unity in LDS political identity. However,
even LDS democrats seem to identify with a republican candidate when he is running
for president. A recent survey shows that “while 23% of all Utah Democrats view
Governor Romney favorably, that proportion goes up to 42% when looking only at
Mormon Democrats” (Monson). The fact that Mormons have changed who they favor
based on shared beliefs rather than a common political party is proof that
there is a common LDS political identity.
There is a distinct LDS political identity in the
United States simply because of a common citizenship. The values of an American
and a Mormon combined are common and people who are American and LDS stand up
for democracy. However, if we were to try to apply these generalizations
outside the U.S. they would not hold. Some think LDS people have a common
identity because of our emphasis on unity and obedience to those in authority.
However, LDS leaders make it a point to say that the church is “neutral in
matters of party politics” (Mormon Newsroom). They encourage members to
participate and vote, but do not really get involved unless an issue will have
significant moral consequences. If LDS members were not citizens of the same
country their political identity would vary more.
The knowledge that we all are children of God, that we
have agency, and that some things are good and others evil are only a few of
the shared beliefs that change how LDS members view government. A common idea of authority being legitimate
only through God’s organization or the consensus of the people also changes
their actions. For many LDS members this
follows the idea of primordialism; they have been taught LDS values sense
primary and it’s hard to see the world another way. However, the church is
vastly growing due to missionary work and many converts choose to change their
identity to being LDS. This choice follows the constructivism theory that “identities
are malleable and anything can become politicized” (Hawkins). One example of this
was the support of Proposition 8, in California, by LDS members (latimes). The
definition of a family became politicized because that idea is important to LDS
people. As members learn truth they
change how they make collectively binding decisions through politics.
There is a
distinct LDS political identity in the United States first because of shared
American values. Those who are LDS also make decisions based on shared beliefs
more than a political party’s ideology. This aligns with the constructivism theory
because members learn truth and change their political actions accordingly.
Works Cited
·
"Political
Neutrality." Www.mormonnewsroom.org. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 Oct. 2012.
<http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/official-statement/political-neutrality>.
·
Monson, Quin. "Do LDS
Dems like Mitt Romney?" Utah Data Points. N.p., n.d. Web.
<http://utahdatapoints.com/>.
·
Hawkins, Kirk. “Class
Lecture”, Plsci 150. BYU 10/10
Camille, I appreciated that you pointed out that members of the Church view both democratic and theocratic government to be legitimate, with the understanding that the ruler in the theocratic government is truly appointed by God. The great historical example of this is Governor Young. While he might not sound very familiar under that title, President Brigham Young certainly was the first governor of Utah; if we could ask a 19th-century Utahn, we would find that the legitimacy of his authority came not from popular consent but from divine commission.
ReplyDeleteI disagree with your idea that the LDS political identity is primordial in nature. Primordialism is the idea that our political beliefs are gained from some fundamental aspects of our nature. Yet, in your post you say that our values are "taught to us in primary". If the theory of primordialism were true, it would be impossible for a primary teacher to instill values in children, because they would already have natural unchanging values imprinted in them at birth. On the balance, I feel like your argument more strongly supports the ideas of constructivism than primordialism.
ReplyDeleteI was pleased that you made concessions recognizing that LDS members are both Democrats and Republicans and that part of the reason that U.S. LDS members share a political identity is partially because they are U.S. citizens rather than it being a wholly religious concept.
ReplyDeleteI agree that political identity includes democrats and republicans in the LDS culture. I do not think it is derived from the primorialistic approach. I feel it is strictly constructivism.
ReplyDelete