Blog 5: Political
Identity
There is
indeed a somewhat distinct political identity among the Latter-day Saints in
the United States. The major LDS political identity is more conservative or
moderate than liberal. The LDS culture does not seem to breed many too many liberally
minded individuals in the United States. Although they most certainly do exist,
they are the minority by a fairly large margin. In a 2009 news article, Dan
Gilgoff mentioned some statistics on Mormon political preferences. He stated: “Six-in-ten
Mormons identify as conservative, about three-in-ten (27%) say they consider
themselves moderate and only one-in-ten identify as liberal. This is in stark
contrast to the general population, in which roughly a third identify as
conservative (37%), a third as moderate (36%) and 20% as liberal” (Gilgoff).
The conclusion to be made from this information is not only are a majority of
Mormons conservative or moderate but also these statistics are rather unique to
LDS culture and differ from the country’s overall political divisions and
identity.
I think the
cause of this unique LDS political identity is the core ideology behind the
religion. Members in the church are constantly taught to do all they can to
help themselves before they ask for church assistance (welfare program). Beyond
this, members of the church are taught to learn who they are and learn how to
work hard and rely on themselves and the Lord. These values instilled in
Latter-day saints create the foundation for the more conservative idea that all
people ought to lookout and care for themselves unless they really need help.
This idea creates disconnect between many church members and the U. S. welfare
program. Family values are also emphasized
in the church and as such there is usually a strong bond within families and
between members of families. As a result I believe political ideas are shared
with younger generations and they are passed on.
This
obvious presence of an LDS political identity here in the U. S. sort of debunks
the primordialism argument. This argument is supported by Marx and claims that
identities that can become political are formed early in life or perhaps are
vaguely genetic (Samuels). I don’t think many scholars would try to argue that
little children create an LDS identity. Even the Mormons themselves only
baptize children into the church at the age of 8 or what they call they age of
accountability. That being said I think this idea of an LDS political identity
helps the constructivism argument. Once an individual does decide to become a
member of the LDS faith and takes up that identity for themselves their
political ideas are likely to change a little bit. This religious identity is
so core and central to the Mormon lifestyle that even many of their political
ideas are influenced heavily by their faith proving that even religion can
become politicized.
The LDS definitely
have a distinct conservative/moderate political identity here in the U.S. This
identity is the product of religious ideas and commonalities among the Mormons.
While there are exceptions to this identity, the majority of Latter-day Saints
follow the conservative/moderate political parties and vote accordingly. This
is not a result of something primordial but rather something constructed
through the beliefs of the LDS people.
Sources
Gilgoff, Dan. "A Political Portrait
of Mormons: More Republican/Conservative than Evangelicals." U. S. News and World Report. N.p., 27 July 2009. Web. <http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/god-and-country/2009/07/27/a-political-portrait-of-mormons-more-republicanconservative-than-evangelical>.
Samuels, David J. "Political
Identity." Comparative Politics. New York: Pearson
Education, 2013. N. pag. Print.
Interesting thoughts regarding constructivism. Are you sure Marx supported it though? I'm pretty sure he dealt purely with economic diversity and class distinction.
ReplyDelete