Is there a “Mormon political identity”
in the United States? The issue, to both the insider and outsider of the church,
may seem a bit complicated. Initial thoughts might be, “Well, aren’t all Mormons
just a bunch of conservative republicans?” However, with just a little bit of research,
one would have to say, “Apparently not...” What is political identity? David J.
Samuels, in his book Comparative Politics,
defines political identity as “the ways that individuals categorize themselves
and others, and how they understand the power relationships of domination and
oppression that exist between groups” (Samuels 2011). In other words, as Kirk
A. Hawkins, Associate Professor of Political Science at Brigham Young
University, stated, [A political identity is] any identity that significantly shapes
our political decisions, especially when it is the most important identity to
do so.”
In consideration of those two definitions, what
is the identity that shapes the political decisions of the LDS faith? Is it not
the doctrines of the Church that form the distinct basis for political decisions
rather than party platforms for members of the LDS faith? One would be, the
church and its members would hope, hard press to find Mormons more converted to
a political party than to their faith. In other words, what is the Mormon political
identity? “Mormonism”
The Mormon political identity is different from other political
identities in that it encompasses and transcends politics without being particularly
political. More common political identities, such as political parties, are politically
easier to understand and are more clearly identifiable. Political Parties have
the benefit of clear political
platforms where politics is the one and only game. However, The Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints has no political platform, no political agenda, and
only rare interest in pushing public policy, particularly in the form of a typical
political machine.
Rather, at the foundation of the church is a set of core, fundamental
beliefs that drive the decisions of its members including in matters of politics,
thus creating the Mormon Political identity. The root causation for the Mormon political
identity leans perhaps most toward constructive ideals. A primary role that church
is that of a teacher, to teach its members how to live and be. Thus, the Mormon
Political identity is one that is carefully constructed by the church, though
with purposes beyond that of politics in mind.
Wisely so, the Church
maintains strict political neutrality and does not endorse candidates or
parties. The Church sees its own political identity as something more supernal than
slur of political flair that changes with the whims of the people in an effort
to secure votes. The ideals of the
Church are, supposedly, unchanging and fixed, while political platforms change
with every year and thus make identification with any particular political party
simply impossible, posing too much of a risk of misrepresentation.
However, what one does see, in the United States, among members of
the Church is a fairly consistent subsequent alignment with whichever party at the time is closest aligned with the beliefs
of the LDS faith. The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life, in their 2009
survey, found that 65% of Mormon either support or lean towards the Republican Party
while 22% support or lean towards the Democratic Party (The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life 2009). As the survey goes
on to show, there is diffidently a common political ideology among members of
the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The data would suggest that
currently, overall the Republican Party aligns closest to the actual Mormon political
identity. However this is not a perfect alignment.
However, common alignment ought not to be confused as a Mormon political
identity in and of itself. One has to remember that, to be accredited to the country’s
two-party system, virtually all citizens have to at least partially identify themselves
with one party or another for that lack of any other real choice. However this
hardly merits the claim that a particular political party constitutes the
Mormon political identity for that party is not the dominating or primary influence of political decisions. It is still the teaching
of the Church. The cause for
the Mormon Political identity ought to be clear in that it stems from the
unified commitment of its members to their faith. One who desires to understand
further the Mormon Political identity has only to study more closely the principles
and doctrines that form the foundation of the LDS faith.
Bibliography
Samuels, David J. Comparative Politics. Upper
Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc., 2011.
The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. A
Portrait of Mormons in the U.S. July 24, 2009. http://www.pewforum.org/Christian/Mormon/A-Portrait-of-Mormons-in-the-US--Social-and-Political-Views.aspx
(accessed October 12, 2012).
It's true that the church generally strives to be apolitical. So why do you think they chose to make an exception for Proposition 8?
ReplyDeleteThere are a lot of similar policies that the church has stayed silent about, but they decided to break the trend for that one in particular. I've often wondered why that is.
A key role of a prophet is that of a seer. That is foreseeing things not fully visible to us and thus giving us counsel accordingly. I believe that it is safe to say that the weight and impact of proposition 8 was such that it merited involvement for, I believe, the sake of not only California and the nation but for the church's members and scores more as well in solidifying where we stand and that a lines do need to be drawn in this world we live in. The Lord knows far more than we do and is far wiser than we are. It helps sometimes to remember that God is seldom doing just one thing but countless things at once. The answer to take it on faith may seem weak, but when you ponder why the church does or doesn't do you can usually catch at least part of the picture.
ReplyDelete