The
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has strict doctrine and beliefs.
These values have caused many to question whether the Church has an official political identity that all
members must adhere to. There is no official political identity, although
there is much unofficial identity associated with being LDS. The teachings of
the Church are taught from a young age and as an individual grows and forms
their own political ideologies they tend toward the same political views.
The Mormon political identity in the United States is constructive in.
A distinct majority of Latter-day Saints
identify with the Republican party. This can be attributed to the Church’s
doctrines against both gay marriage and abortion. Although these are only two of many political
discussions, these issues tend to be the basis upon which many Mormons build their political
views. In official Church doctrine it
states that, “We do not believe it just to mingle religious influence with
civil government, whereby one religious society is fostered and another
proscribed in its spiritual privileges, and the individual rights of its
members, as citizens, denied” (Doctrine and Covenants 134:9). It seems that
this statement would ensure the “separation of Church and State,” but there are
many who believe that anyone who votes against a Republican presidential candidate
(especially a “brother in the Gospel”) or
holds any sort of Democratic political views is of the devil (Brooks).
There are many people who
identify as a conservative/Republican because of their “Mormon beliefs”. However
there are also many people that identify with the liberal/Democratic for the
same reason (Peterson). These are
both valid arguments, but the Republican Mormon mindset is much more widely accepted
and often hinders the political growth and diversity of the Church as a whole.
The two big arguments of gay marriage and abortion, for LDS conservatives, are
a huge base of reasoning in this matter. Other key issues in politics are often
overlooked. A recent survey shows that
only half of all Americans know the major political issues and where each of
the major parties stand on each issue (What the Public Knows about the
Political Parties, 1). People take the information that is important to them and
base their political identity on those issues. If a sample were taken of LDS
voters, it may show different statistics,
but probably wouldn’t vary too much.
It is apparent to see that there
has been a wide shift in political opinion among members of the Church over the
years. Early in the history of the Church, many members were Liberal in their
thinking. Many Church leaders, including B.H. Roberts and Stephen L. Richards,
in the late 1800s-early 1900s supported Democratic ideologies openly (Alexander
52). Even Joseph Smith supported a nationalized bank as well as the abolishment
of slavery, which was one of the most liberal ideologies of the time. These
examples, and many others, show that there has not always been the same
political identity associated with the members of the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints. Because of shifts in
partisan platforms, the Church’s political leaning has changed over the years. This
is also another evidence of a constructive, malleable political identity as a
whole (Samuels 153). There have been many ideological shifts in each
party since the beginning of the Church in 1830, but only very rarely have
Saints been told specifically how to vote. In these issues members of the
Church were asked to vote for or against issues, not necessarily candidates. An example of this can be seen in the 2004
elections in California where the Church invited members to vote for
Proposition 8 to keep same-sex marriage from being legal (Monson Jun 2008).
The Church continues to “affirm [its]
neutrality regarding political parties, platforms, and candidates" and
tells us that "principles compatible with the gospel may be found in
various political parties" (Monson
Sept 2008). Even with these efforts in place to stop a Church-wide
political view from developing, members of the Church continue to create such
an unofficial identity in the United States.
Work Cited:
Alexander, Thomas. Mormonism in Transition: a History of Mormons 1890-1930. University
of Illinois Press. Oct. 1, 1996.
Brooks,
Joanna. “My Mormon-for-Obama bumper sticker is drawing serious fire.” Ask Mormon Girl. Oct. 1, 2012. http://askmormongirl.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/my-mormon-for-obama-bumper-sticker-is-drawing-serious-fire-help/
Doctrine and
Covenants. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Monson, Thomas S., Eyring, Henry B., Uchtdorf,
Dieter F. Preserving Traditional
Marriage and Strengthening Families. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints. Jun. 20, 2008.
Monson, Thomas
S., Eyring, Henry B., Uchtdorf, Dieter
F. “Political Participation, Voting, and
the Political Neutrality of the Church.” Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day
Saints. Sept. 11, 2008.
Peterson,
Boyd. “Why I’m a Mormon Democrat.” Utah
County Democrats. Sept. 1, 2009. http://www.utahcountydems.com/content/view/300/126/
Samuels, David J. Comparative Politics. Pearson,
University of Minnesota. 2013.
“What the
Public Knows about the Political Parties.” Pew Research Center. April 11, 2012.
http://www.people-press.org/2012/04/11/what-the-public-knows-about-the-political-parties/1/
I thought that your many historical examples added a lot of credibility to your paper. Good job!
ReplyDeleteI really liked that you used sources from the church. It made it more credible because it showed the political identity from a Mormon view instead of a worldly view.
ReplyDelete