Blog 5: Political
Identity
Politics is
a topic that every single person has an opinion on because politics affect each
and every one of us. How we develop these opinions can be explained by either a
primordialist point of view or a constructivist point of view. This is how we
develop our political identity. The majority of LDS members are conservative,
or Republican. Data shows that there is a distinct LDS political identity in
the United States and that it is mostly accredited to a primordialist argument.
Political
identity is the ways that individuals categorize themselves and others, and how
they understand the power relationships of domination and oppression that
exists between groups (Samuels). The two main approaches to understanding
political identity are primordialism and constructivism. Primordialism assumes
that identities are something people are born with or that emerge through deep
psychological processes in earl childhood, given one’s family and community
context (Samuels). The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints stresses the
importance of family and community. The church believes very strongly in the
importance of being taught in the home. Both the LDS church and the
primordialist argument highlight family and community.
While the
LDS church does not advocate any specific party or party member, it does
encourage its members to be politically active and involved in government. Many
of the churches teachings are conservative and therefore, are parallel to the
republican platform. The church and republican party share similar views on
important topics such as gay marriage and abortion. In 2011, The Pew Forum
conducted a nationwide survey of over 1,000 members of the LDS church. Of those
that were polled, 66% responded as being conservative, 22% responded as being
moderate and only 8% responded as being liberal (The Pew Forum). Of all those
that were polled, 74% said that leaned towards the Republican Party while only
17% leaned towards the Democratic Party (The Pew Forum). It is interesting to
compare this to the US general public where 45% lean towards the Republican
Party and 48% lean towards the Democratic Party (The Pew Forum). This clearly
shows a strong conservative political identity in the LDS community.
Constructivism assumes that
political identities are malleable, even if they often appear to be
primoridial, and suggest that we think of identity as an evolving political
process rather than as a fixed set of identity categories (Samuels). This
argument carries little weight as too explaining the LDS political identity. The
constructivist argument explains when someone is converted to the LDS church.
As they become more involved in the church and more familiar with the church’s
teachings, their political identity may change. It also may explain when
someone falls away from the LDS church. In this situation someone may also
change his or her political identity. However, once someone is established in
the church, their political identity won’t change because the doctrines of the
church do not change by popular opinion or current trends. The doctrines stay
the same.
The teachings that occur in the
home and in the church have a strong influence on this. Parents teach their
children their conservative views and then the children also grow up learning
and believing the church’s doctrine, which is also conservative. This
repetition beginning at such a young age helps develop a political identity.
This is explained perfectly by the primordialist argument.
Sources
1.
Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. 2012. Mormons in America.
January 12.
http://www.pewforum.org/Christian/Mormon/mormons-in-america.aspx (accessed
October 10, 2012).
2. Samuels, David J. 2013.
Comparative Politics. Minneapolis: Pearson Education.
Although the blog determines the fact that there is a pattern of those who identify with a certain political party and belong to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, it does not cover whether those who claim to belong to these parties actually hold a strong identity to it. It is possible for them to claim they are Republican, for example, and not feel a loyalty to the Republican party.
ReplyDeleteSome of the language used I thought was a little absolute. "This is explained perfectly by...." It made me wonder why a little bit more attention was not given to explaining why the constructivist argument was not given a little bit more credence. Overall though, I feel like it was well written.
ReplyDelete