Roy Copans
Prof. Hawkins
Political Science 150
10/12/2012
My argument for this
blog is that there is a distinct LDS political identity here in the United
States. I feel that its presence comes primarily from the aspects of primordialist
arguments. In this blog, I will explore the factors behind this argument of the
presence of an LDS political identity and link them to what we have learned
thus far about the different causes of political identity.
I feel that it is
not a secret that members of the LDS Church are predominantly conservative and of
the Republican Party. Of course, however, there is no commandment or revelation
from the Lord that causes members to have that affiliation. In fact, the Church
is very strong about its official position of political neutrality. Elder M.
Russell Ballard recently confirmed that very astutely in an interview with CNN,
stating that the Church does not endorse presidential candidates or affiliate
with any party[i] However;
I do believe that many members think that the Republican Party better suits our
doctrine, supporting the Church’s beliefs about families and other key
principles. This is the distinct political identity that members of the LDS Church have.
Mormon political
preferences have definitely been more out in the open in the past few years. A
recent historical example would be that of Proposition 8 in California in 2008,
which was proposing to ban gay marriage. Because of the Church’s belief about protecting
families, large amounts of money were donated to conservative support groups in
favor of passing the state amendment. The amendment was indeed passed, resulting
in the state now recognizing marriage as only between a man and a woman[ii].
Now, as the 2012 presidential race
tightens, Governor Mitt Romney’s candidacy as the Republican nominee draws
national attention. Despite being the minority of the state, Utah Democrats
were surveyed to state their opinions on Governor Romney. Interestingly, only
23% of Utah Democrats viewed him favorably, but when you looked at just Utah
LDS Democrats that number jumped to 42%[iii].
This tells me that now, with a Mormon presidential candidate, religion is an
important value to one’s political identity, and even though they may disagree
with his policies, LDS Democrats still feel a connection to Governor Romney.
The primordialist
approach to understanding the politicization of identity focuses on natural
instincts and connections, indicating that identity is largely based on one’s
upbringing, family, and community[iv].
I feel that this is the argument that best describes why members of the LDS
Church are predominantly conservative. Especially in Utah, a state that voted 73%
Republican in 2004 and 63% in 2008[v],
the Church community that people grow up around is a big factor in shaping one’s
political preferences. Where I come from in northern Virginia, the Church has
an obviously weaker presence, but Ward and Stake families still play major
roles in one’s upbringing. These Church communities form deep connections
between you and others, which the textbook calls kinship bonds. These kinship
bonds are more metaphorical, basing your cultural connections to an imaginary “extended
family[vi],”
which, in this case, is the Church. Our identity as members of The Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is what bonds us together, no matter where
you are from. I know that personally, my political affiliation of being a
conservative Republican comes from my family and from my feeling that my religious
beliefs are better represented by that party.
My argument stands
that there is indeed a distinct political identity in the LDS Church here in
America, and that this identity is formed through primordialism, focusing
heavily on one’s upbringing, family, and Church community to determine the
identity that we will acquire.
Works Cited
[i] Deseret
News. (2012) “Elder Ballard confirms LDS Church’s political neutrality.” <http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865561069/Elder-Ballard-confirms-LDS-Churchs-political-neutrality.html>
[ii]
Wikipedia: California Proposition 8. (2012) “Campaign funding and spending”
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_8>
[iii] Monson,
Quin. Utah Data Points. (2012) “Do LDS Dems like Mitt Romney?” < http://utahdatapoints.com/>
[iv] Samuels,
David J. Comparative Politics.Page
153. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Pearson Education. 2013.
[v] 270
to win. (2012) “Election Results: Utah” <http://www.270towin.com/states/Utah>
[vi] Samuels,
David J. Comparative Politics.Page
153. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. Pearson Education. 2013.
I think your findings better support a view of constructivism, rather than primordialism. The primordialist views says that political identity is defined from within, so if I lean left here and now, I would lean left no matter where or when I was born. Specifically, in your second to last paragraph, you state that our identity is specifically affected by our our wards and families, but this is at odds with the idea that I would be the same no matter which ward, family, or faith I was born into. Your post supports a form of constructivism, although maybe not the traditional one presented in the book.
ReplyDelete