Blog 5, the LDS Political Identity
Often people assume that Mormons are
devout Republicans, due to our conservative beliefs, and most recently our
stand against gay marriage. Though are we really as invested in the Republican
Party as people see us? Has the church given rise to an “LDS Political Identity”
that is as uniformly accepted across the board as the rest of the country
believes? That’s what we’re about to decide.
In order to determine where there is
an LDS political identity, we must first define political identity. Political
identity is, as defined by David J. Samuels, “the ways that individuals
categorize themselves and others and how they understand the power
relationships of domination and oppression that exist between groups.1”
While this is a very comprehensive definition of political identity, Professor
Hawkins more simply defined it as any identity that significantly shapes
political decisions.
If we look to “Do LDS Dems like Mitt
Romney?” on Utah Data Points, we can see that there is indeed an LDS identity
that transcends into politics. The data collected by Quin Monson, stated that
23% of Mormon Democrats thought that Mitt Romney was “very favorable,” while
only 10% of all democrats said the same thing. Through this we can see that the
church does indeed affect political decisions. If the church didn’t affect political
decisions, we would expect Mormon Democrats to vote the same as the rest of
their party; however this shows that there is a definite increase in support
for Mitt Romney that is unusually high. Therefore, since Mormon Democrats are
showing stronger support for an LDS Republican, this shows that there is an LDS
political identity.
This doesn’t necessarily prove that
there is a distinct party identity that is associated with the LDS political
identity. Due to the survey, we can see that Mormons vote for the candidate
that they think will further their beliefs, which are founded in the gospel, by
voting across party lines. There are a large amount of Mormon Democrats, and
while they support their party, the “Mormon” appears to play a stronger role,
and have a stronger sense of identity than does “Democrat.” Since a democrat
would most likely vote for President Obama, as he is the democratic candidate,
we can see that there is a very strong LDS political identity, rather than
party identity.
We would consider this political
identity to have developed mainly through constructivism. Many Mormons are
converts, and switch from other political identities to the LDS political
identity, showing that it is malleable, even though it may appear primordial.
In a lot of cases however, it is primordial. The LDS church is very focused on
families, so being raised in the gospel provides that primordial political
identity that is developed early in life. However, people still leave the
church, and aren’t bound to this political identity; they choose to accept it, and
so we would still consider it to be constructivist.
The reason this identity exists in
the first place can be largely associated with the close knit culture of the
LDS church. Where members are placed into separate wards where they encourage
weekly attendance, are given the responsibility to visit and care for other
members of the ward, and mainly stand together against the temptations and
tribulations that come from living in the world. This culture promotes this
very strong LDS identity, forming kinship bonds amongst its members. Kinship
bonds that are normally associated with primordial identities, but don’t
necessarily have to be, as we can see with the strong LDS identity.
Therefore, we can conclude that
there is a LDS political identity, a strong one, which is mainly developed
through constructivism, though is also largely primordial, and is due to the
community and culture associated with the church.
Works
Cited
1.
Samuels, David J.
"Chapter 6: Political Identity." Comparative
Politics. Upper River Saddle, NJ: Pearson Education, n.d. 148-70. Print.
2.
Monson, Quin. "Do
LDS Dems like Mitt Romney?" Utah Data Points. N.p., 22 Aug. 2012. Web. 12 Oct. 2012.
Good point about kinship bonds being formed within tight knit wards and stakes. I also liked how you showed that LDS Democrats are influenced by their Church ties.
ReplyDelete