In any group or subset within society there is often an
underlying political identity. A political identity, according to Samuels, is “the
way individuals categorize themselves and others, and how they understand the
relationships of domination and oppression that exist between groups.” Mormons
especially seem to have a distinct political identity. In fact, the New York
Times explains the Mormon political identity like this, “… the traditional
profile of American Latter-day Saints… tend[s] to be conservative, Republican,
and white.” The reason for this political identity is that the majority of
Mormons in the United States are white; they do tend to be more conservative,
and often vote Republican. A Pew Survey reveals, “Mormons are more conservative
compared with the general public, the survey finds. Seventy-four percent of
Mormons surveyed say they lean toward the Republican party, and 66 percent
describe themselves as conservatives, much higher than the national average…”
What is the
cause of this political identity? Some may link the presence of this political
identity to the standards that the church advocates. For example, the church
advocates their members to be debt free, and it is easy for members to
translate this to the government as well, which would mean they would be
following a more conservative leader. The church also advocates against gay
marriage and abortion (except in cases of rape and incest) -and conservative
leaders also tend to be anti- gay marriage and anti –abortion. There are other
such examples of where it is easy to link church doctrine to the Republican
platform. However, not all Mormons fit into the political identity of being a
conservative republican. These Mormons often fight to have their voice heard,
so that others can know that there is a minority of Mormons who are more
liberal and vote along Democratic Party lines. One example of this is the bumper
sticker “I’m a Mormon, and I’m voting for Obama.” This minority of Democrats
within the Latter Day Saint community wishes to have their voice heard to try
and break the current political identity and “Mormon mold.”
These
“Mormon minorities” raise the question of whether the political identity of
Mormons comes from primordialism or constructivism. Primordialism is, “…
identities are something people are born with or that emerge through deep
psychological processes in early childhood, given one’s family and community
context” (Samuels). Constructivism is “political identities are malleable, even
if they often appears to be primordial, and suggests that we think of identity
as an evolving process rather than as a fixed set of identity categories” (Samuels).
It seems that the Mormon political identity is one that is constructed over
time, and can be changed, and therefore fits more under the constructivism
argument. Most children don’t understand politics, but do understand that
“Jesus loves me.” It’s not until children become older that they are able to
understand politics and how it relates to their church. By the time this
occurs, they often choose to follow the political identity, or discard it,
based on what they have seen and believe. Therefore political identity for
individuals in the Mormon Church is malleable, as we see the context in which
individuals see themselves in regards to their religion and politics constantly
changing.
An example
of this is myself. I have been a member of the LDS church my entire life, and
everyone in my family fits the Mormon political identity, except for me. Despite
how I was raised, I have chosen to alter my political views to follow a more
democratic platform. This gives evidence against the primordialism arguments,
and evidence for constructivism arguments in regards to the Mormon political
identity. Others would also agree that despite their being raised in the
church, their political views aren’t based on something that they are
instinctively born with, rather something that evolved and changed as they
learned how to mesh their religious and political views.
Bibliography:
Khan, Huma. 12 January 2012. "Pew Survey: Majority of
Mormons Lean Republican; Half Cite Discrimination Against Their
Faith." ABC News. Accessed 12 October 2012.
<http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/pew-survey-most-mormons-feel-they-are-misunderstood-not-viewed-as-mainstream/>.
Samuels, David J.
2013. Comparative politics. Minneapolis: Pearson, 2013. Print.
Saulny, Susan. 22 May
2012. New York Times. “Black Mormons and the Politics of Identity.” http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/23/us/for-black-mormons-a-political-choice-like-no-other.html?pagewanted=all
Very interesting, I liked your take on constructivism. You're argument for why LDS members are republican was good, yet I felt the part about debt didn't make much sense.
ReplyDeleteI thought this was a very interesting argument made. The way you explained the use of constructivism was convinsing because you backed up your claims so well. Good job.
ReplyDeleteI like the mentioning of the church standards. The examples provided provide a great outline for your point, as well as the contrast between primordialism and constructivism.
ReplyDelete