Many members of the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints, or LDS Church, align themselves towards the
Republican Party. However, there are still others who are loyal Democrats. The
LDS Church maintains a neutral partisan political policy. It does not endorse
any candidate running for public office, even when one of its own members is
running. The Church allows its followers to choose who should be elected.
Because of this policy of political neutrality, I believe there is not a
specific LDS political identity strong enough to persuade voters to vote for an
LDS candidate.
According
to the lecture, political identity is “the ways [people] categorize themselves,
with a resulting feeling of close emotional association” that “significantly
shapes [their] political decisions” (lecture). Since political identities shape
decisions for all people who categorize themselves as such, the LDS political
identity should determine the outcome more than partisan identity. This is not
the case.
In
the 2012 race to the White House, Mitt Romney, the first LDS candidate on a
major party ticket, is the Republican nominee. According to recent polling
data, 79% of Utah LDS Republicans agree that Romney is a good choice (Patterson).
This seems not very significant, as most Republicans would vote for Romney even
if they didn’t like the guy. On the Democratic side of the partisan ideology,
however, 42% of Utah LDS Democrats have a favorable view of Governor Romney (Monson).
Although they agree with some of his views, I believe those beliefs aren’t
strong enough to change their votes from blue to red.
Partisan
politics have been a part of the American political system from the early days
of Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Many people often associate with
the political party of their parents. Others choose one because of shared
beliefs. A primordialist view, a view that says identity is “innate and largely
unchanging,” would take this argument (Samuels 153). However, the view that
members of the Church can choose which candidate they want, although they got
their partisan ideologies from their parents, would be a constructivist view,
one that can change, but could stay the same (Samuels 153). Members could all
vote for Romney if they wanted to do so; however, many won’t because they
disagree with his policies.
Faith
is a strong guiding principle that can help people determine what they should
do. However, this isn’t necessarily how voters choose their political
representatives. Even in the Catholic Church, there isn’t one solid political
identity. In the 2012 Presidential election, both Vice Presidential nominees
are Catholic. Both agree with their Church’s doctrines about life; however,
they don’t have the same views on policies. The LDS Church is no different. Its
members can vote for whomever they choose. Faith isn’t the only defining
characteristic that determines political involvement.
Works Cited
Lecture
Monson, Quin. ""Do LDS
Dems like Mitt Romney?" 2012.Web. <http://www.utahdatapoints.com/>.
Patterson, Kelly. ""Who
thinks Governor Romney's candidacy is good for the LDS Church?" 2012.Web.
<http://www.utahdatapoints.com/>.
Samuels, David. Comparative
Politics. 1st ed. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc., 2013. Print.
I disagree I think that 79% is large enough % to that Mormons have political identity but, good blog.
ReplyDeleteI don't think the party to which the identity is associated is important, if there is one. What if the political identity of the church is in favor of a more liberal tax distribution but a more conservative view on abortion? The real issue is whether the distribution of the votes of members is distinct from the rest of the population, reflecting an LDS motivation for certain political decisions.
ReplyDelete