Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Blog 10: BYU Political Review Article


            Globalization is a household word in our day. I discovered this while serving my mission: as I sat in the Los Angeles apartment of a Mexican immigrant family, my friends readily used the Spanish word globalización. I do not now remember the bulk of our conversation, but I remember feeling astonished at the facility with which this cognate seemed to be used across languages. Globalization is a real subject of conversation throughout the world. Yet – even among members of the Church – I have not been able to distinguish an overwhelmingly positive or negative reaction to globalization. The general consequences of globalization are indeed a subject of debate, so it is not too surprising that members of the Church and students at BYU disagree on this point. Despite the differing opinions of individual members of the Church, I propose that globalization is helping the Church to progress, particularly through the globalization of liberal politics and the culture of moral individualism.
            In order to clearly uphold this argument, allow me to define globalization here. By globalization, I understand the international diffusion of political, economic and social institutions, practices, values, and beliefs.
            First, the Church has progressed as a result of political globalization. Early on, Joseph Smith sent several missionaries among Native Americans to preach the restored gospel to them, with the particular promise of restoring the gospel to the Lamanites. The Church continued to identify native tribes as modern-day Lamanites through the Indian Placement Program, which was active from 1947 to 2000.[1] However, the Church recently revised the introduction to the Book of Mormon to teach that the Lamanites “are among the ancestors of the American Indians” where it previously taught that the Lamanites were their “principal ancestors.”[2] While it may be argued that this change is a result of new hypotheses regarding the origins of Native Americans, it must be noted that the idea that Native Americans came to America from the Orient is not a new one. The truth is that the Church has responded to the research available on the subject due to an increasing need to recognize political equality as part of the civil rights of all. While the original missionaries thought of themselves as the sons of Ephraim restoring the degenerate seed of Manasseh, Native American civil rights activism – spurred on by international recognition of human rights – has caused the Church to recognize the accuracy of research regarding native origins. Thus, political globalization has improved the accuracy of Church historiography.
            Second, cultural globalization has helped the Church to discern between truth and error. As the xenophobia that followed the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 has died off, American Christians have seen an increasing need to accept the legitimacy of Islam as a major world religion, and have become increasingly accepting of other belief systems in general. As members of the Church have experienced this shift to a global acceptance of religious liberty, they have frowned upon the old anti-papal Mormon idea that the Catholic Church was the church of the devil, described in the Book of Mormon as “the whore of all the earth.”[3] Members of the Church have come to cherish President Gordon B. Hinckley’s admonition to non-Church members to continue to value what truth they have gleaned from their previous religious experience and to then receive more truth as they enter the Church.[4] It is clear that the Church is no longer a religious society located in and around Utah, but rather a world-wide Church: one that has come to recognize – as a result of cultural globalization – the presence of truth in various belief systems.
            I would like to make two more observations regarding the impact of globalization on the Church. First, it must be observed that the Church abandoned more radical doctrines such as plural marriage early on, as the frontier closed, that is, as mainstream (monogamous) American culture diffused throughout the continent. Second, as the Church has stepped more and more in line with traditional American culture, it has adopted the culture that is currently dominating throughout the world as a result of globalization. Thus, globalization may facilitate the expansion of the Church, since it facilitates the assimilation of new members into Church culture.


[1] Matthew Garrett, "Mormons, Indians and Lamanites: The Indian Student Placement Program, 1947-2000." Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University, 2010.
[2] Moore, Carrie A. (2007). Debate renewed with change in Book of Mormon introduction. Deseret News. Retrieved from http://www.deseretnews.com/article/695226008/Debate-renewed-with-change-in-Book-of-Mormon-introduction.html?pg=all, 04 Dec 2012.
[3] See 1 Nephi 14:10; McConkie, Joseph Fielding (2003), “The Mormon Doctrine Saga, 1958 and 1966”, The Bruce R. McConkie Story: Reflections of a Son, Salt Lake City, Utah: Deseret Book, ISBN 1-59038-205-6.
[4] Hinckley, Gordon, B. (Aug. 1998). Excerpts from recent addresses of President Gordon B. Hinckley. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Retrieved from https://www.lds.org/ensign/1998/08/excerpts-from-recent-addresses-of-president-gordon-b-hinckley?lang=eng, 04 Dec 2012.

No comments:

Post a Comment